Could a new team learn the business while delivering?
The team began learning the business and system from the start and continued that work over the first two years.
Case study · Financial Services
An Australian financial insurance company approached Shinetech to rebuild an ageing SaaS platform. The engagement began with fixed-price projects and developed into a dedicated team supporting the core product.

The situation
The client’s SaaS management platform had an outdated interface and slow response times that were limiting growth. In 2018, the company approached Shinetech to rebuild and upgrade it.
The initial deadline was three months. The team also had limited knowledge of the client’s business and existing system, so learning the product and maintaining delivery quality were important parts of the engagement.
The project questions
The team began learning the business and system from the start and continued that work over the first two years.
After four fixed-price projects over seven months, the client chose an Offshore Development Center model.
The work included performance, cloud security and ongoing core-platform development.
The solution
The programme covered interface and functionality improvements, platform upgrades and stronger cloud-server security. The source identifies AWS, ASP.NET Core, microservices and Redis within the technical context.
Security work included auditing, reinforcement and scanning.
The team became responsible for core-platform development. Its cross-functional capability included UX/UI design, .NET development and testing, with automated testing contributing to iteration quality.
How the work unfolded
The collaboration began with fixed-price work and an initial three-month deadline. Four fixed-price projects were completed over seven months before the client moved to a dedicated-team model.
Upgrade the platform, improve its interface and functionality, and carry out cloud-server auditing, reinforcement and scanning. The source reports performance improvement without specifying the measurement method.
The team grew from two engineers into a cross-functional group of eight. Continuous learning of the client’s product and business supported communication and subsequent development decisions.
Technology and delivery context
The result
The client continued with an ODC engagement after the initial four fixed-price projects.
The source reports a 30–40% improvement. It does not define the benchmark, so this is presented as a source-reported result.
The source describes improved platform stability and an integrated team handling core-platform development.
Tell us about your existing system, business workflows and delivery requirements.
Discuss Your Project