Get in Touch
← Back to case studies

Hospitality · Camera review

Finding the footage behind a multi-location incident

A restaurant technology provider gained a responsive camera-review interface that connected locations, live views, archived footage, and clip export through its existing video services.

  • Video review
  • Multi-location operations
  • Archive playback
  • API integration

At a glance

Business need
Help operators locate and retrieve relevant footage
Product
Responsive camera management application
Delivery
Frontend development, integration, deployment, and QA
Technology
React, TypeScript, existing video APIs

The business context

Knowing that something happened was different from finding the footage.

For a business operating across restaurant locations, reviewing an incident starts with two practical questions: where did it happen, and when? An operator then needs the right camera, the relevant part of the recording, and a way to retain the useful segment.

The client already had backend, storage, and video-forwarding services. Shinetech’s role was to turn those capabilities into a responsive camera-management experience, connecting location selection, live monitoring, archived playback, and video download through the existing APIs.

Reconstructed camera archive interface with a fictional empty restaurant, camera list, selected timeline range, and clip-export controls.
System view

Review the interval that matters

A generated restaurant scene and fictional camera records illustrate archive review. The location, footage, timeline, and controls are illustrative, with no customer surveillance data. View full-size interface (new tab)

The operating challenge

A wall of live cameras did not solve the archive-review task.

Live viewing, historical playback, and event review involve different navigation. A live grid provides a broad view; investigating a past moment requires a narrower location, camera, and time range. Users also need the controls to move through that range without losing their review context.

Requirements evolved during delivery. Events moved from timeline markers into a separate page, and archived footage gained a playback dialog. These changes affected UI behavior, API agreements, and test scope, so they needed to be handled across the frontend and client service boundary.

The delivery decisions

Build the review journey around location, camera, and time.

  1. 01

    Make the location the starting context

    The interface connected authentication and location access with camera selection. Search, filters, and grid or single-camera views supported moving from a group of feeds to the camera relevant to the operator’s task.

  2. 02

    Give archived footage its own controls

    Timeline navigation, playback speed, and time-range selection supported focused review. Existing player and timeline components were integrated into the application, with clip export connecting the selected footage to a practical follow-up action.

  3. 03

    Keep frontend and video-service responsibilities explicit

    Shinetech implemented the React and TypeScript frontend, state management, API integration, deployment, and QA/UAT. The client retained responsibility for backend services, storage, and video forwarding, including the existing video-service integration.

How the workflow holds together

Changing the review flow meant changing the acceptance checks.

An event page is a different interaction

Moving events out of the timeline changed how a user reached relevant footage. The team tracked the change through sprint reviews and a change list, updating the interface, service agreements, and checks rather than silently extending the original scope.

The modular organization—authentication, locations, live feeds, archives, events, and downloads—gave the work clear areas to develop and review. Integration testing and UAT were needed at the points where a selected location or time interval became a request to the client’s services, because a plausible screen alone could not establish that the footage workflow worked.

The delivered result

Operators gained a route from a location to a usable video segment.

Responsive camera access

Users could work with location-based camera views through the delivered frontend.

Focused archive review

Playback and timeline interactions supported finding a relevant period in historical footage.

Clip retrieval

Export and download capabilities connected the review task with the existing video services.

The camera-management application was delivered and remains in use. Shinetech’s contribution covered the frontend and its integrations; the client operates the backend, storage, and video services.

Case taxonomy

Searchable by industry, technology, product, and business need.

Industry and product

  • Hospitality
  • Restaurant technology
  • Camera management

Technology and delivery

  • React
  • TypeScript
  • Responsive web application
  • API integration
  • QA and UAT

Business need

  • Video review
  • Multi-location operations
  • Archive playback
  • Clip export