Can a clinical system support electronic-record audit requirements?
The solution included audit trails, authentication and controlled access aligned with the project’s FDA 21 CFR Part 11 requirements.
Case study · Healthcare
A nationwide U.S. medical-care provider built a SharePoint electronic clinical trial system with audit trails, authenticated InfoPath access and controlled collaboration aligned with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 requirements.

The situation
A U.S. medical-care provider wanted healthcare practitioners to receive timely information and make better patient decisions. The system had to improve communication and collaboration while complying with the FDA’s 21 CFR Part 11 requirements.
Recognise this situation?
The solution included audit trails, authentication and controlled access aligned with the project’s FDA 21 CFR Part 11 requirements.
The delivered system combined controlled collaboration sites with authenticated InfoPath report access and actions.
Agile discovery, focused modules and weekly prioritisation kept working software and continuous client feedback central to delivery.
The project approach
The provider wanted practitioners to receive timely information and make better patient decisions. A fixed long-range plan did not fit changing weekly priorities. The team identified the core clinical process, used a simple modular architecture, and adapted releases through feedback and refactoring while preserving the required audit and authentication capabilities.
Delivered an electronic clinical trial system on SharePoint with audit trails, authenticated InfoPath report access and actions, and controlled clinical collaboration sites.
How the workflow operated
Key information
The result
Tell us about the clinical process, the electronic-record requirements, who needs access and how often delivery priorities change.
Discuss Your Situation